Of Course, Garnett! Why Didn't I Think of That?

Oh wait! I did think of that.

I said that before, Kobe would need a Duncan or Garnett to win. But last I checked niether were available. I would be all for that option. If the Lakers could have picked up one of them, then the decision is easy, you trade Shaq and keep Kobe.

Garnett or Duncan, plus Kobe, done deal.

As for not dealing with Shaq's future decline, I am so. Like I said, Shaq is on the downside of his career, and the Lakers would naturally become Kobe's team, if he wasn't such an egomaniac that broke up a dynasty.

What you're not addressing is how is the Lakers current situation is a good thing.

They can't win if Kobe doesn't score 40 points per night. Even then, that's no guarantee.

You may be right that T-Mac is not a winner, he certainly hasn't proven himself, but honestly I don't believe in Kobe.

He has rings because of Shaq. Everytime Shaq was hurt, which was too often, Kobe and his Lakers had a losing record.

He cannot carry a team, he needs to be the 2nd guy, behind a real leader like Garnett or Duncan or Shaq.

Here, let say this, screw Shaq, I don't care about him for the moment...

Putting Kobe in charge of your team is stupid!!

Bahb, as for my rant, and your description of the ladies that may have inspired it, leave them alone, big girls need love too!

Just ask your wife.

(Readers, please note, I am kidding about Bahb's wife, she is lovely, frankly, I don't know what she is doing with Bahb. And I don't do fat chicks, well, unless I can pop one of Bahb's Viagras before we get to her place)

Actually I do get full of myself, it's hard not to when I'm always right!

I win again!!

Bahb, tell us your thoughts on the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim.